标題:
Xiaoling and Nanjing: Mapping the Imperial Mausoleum in a Fourteenth-Century Capital in China (孝陵與南京:位于中國十四世紀都城中的帝陵)。發表于 Journal of Urban History (ISSN: 0096-1442), September 8, 2022, DOI:10.1177/00961442221120892 (Online first)。
期刊:
Journal of Urban History 創立于1974年,出版世界範圍内城市史的最新研究,屬于SSCI、A&HCI來源期刊。
鍊接:https://doi.org/10.1177/00961442221120892
内容簡介:
都城的建設是禮制的展現,曆代王朝雖然在都城具體的布局上有所不同,但相應的概念為曆代帝王所尊,以維系政權的合法性。其中,宗廟為供奉王朝祖先之所,其建制經曆代探讨而多有流變。相較之下,帝陵雖然也是另一個祖先崇拜之所,但與宗廟相比,帝陵并未在禮制層面被視為都城的一部分。這個原因深受先秦以來生死有别,亡者之所應與生者之寓區隔的觀念影響。在此傳統下,明孝陵是一特例,因為孝陵位于明南京城的外郭城内,屬于南京城的一部分。關于南京與孝陵之間的史料十分缺乏,目前學界多運用風水觀念來探讨孝陵與南京城毗鄰的關系。本文将視角轉向中都與皇陵、奉先殿與乾清宮的空間安排、洪武透過陵寝将其先世與王朝命運的連接方式。在此基礎上,孝陵與南京的布局并非孤例,而可以從洪武對于其他都城空間的安排、情感與禮制的處理方式等層面得到有别于風水的解釋。
摘要:
This paper is about the unique spatial arrangement of the capital (Nanjing) and imperial mausoleum (Xiaoling) in fourteenth-century China. According to Confucian principles and traditional practices, the location of tombs should be separated from the space of the living for philosophical and emotional reasons. However, this convention was challenged by the Hongwu emperor (1368–1398), founder of the Ming dynasty (1368–1644), who built his own imperial mausoleum, Xiaoling, within the confines of the capital, an unprecedented act. According to primary sources—ritual texts, gazettes, tour books, and poetry—this innovative capital–mausoleum plan suggests an extension of the pattern by which the Hongwu emperor honored his ancestors through spatial arrangements and incorporated the imperial ancestors into dynasty-building.
作者簡介
金蕙涵,北京大學考古文博專業博士、明尼蘇達大學曆史學專業博士,菠菜技术交流论坛曆史學系晨晖學者,研究方向為墓葬考古